🔗 Share this article

January 30th, 1972 remains one of the most deadly – and consequential – occasions during thirty years of unrest in this area.

Within the community where events unfolded – the memories of that fateful day are visible on the buildings and etched in public consciousness.

A protest demonstration was conducted on a chilly yet clear day in Derry.

The protest was opposing the policy of detention without trial – detaining individuals without legal proceedings – which had been put in place in response to an extended period of conflict.

Military personnel from the Parachute Regiment shot dead thirteen individuals in the district – which was, and still is, a predominantly Irish nationalist population.

A particular photograph became particularly prominent.

Photographs showed a religious figure, the priest, displaying a blood-stained fabric while attempting to shield a crowd moving a youth, the injured teenager, who had been killed.

Media personnel recorded much footage on the day.

The archive features Fr Daly telling a journalist that soldiers "gave the impression they would discharge weapons randomly" and he was "absolutely certain" that there was no reason for the shooting.

The narrative of events was rejected by the first inquiry.

The initial inquiry concluded the Army had been shot at first.

Throughout the resolution efforts, the administration set up a new investigation, after campaigning by surviving kin, who said Widgery had been a inadequate investigation.

In 2010, the conclusion by the investigation said that overall, the soldiers had fired first and that none of the casualties had posed any threat.

At that time head of state, David Cameron, apologised in the Parliament – saying deaths were "improper and inexcusable."

The police commenced look into the incident.

One former paratrooper, identified as Soldier F, was brought to trial for killing.

Indictments were filed over the fatalities of the first individual, 22, and 26-year-old William McKinney.

The accused was additionally charged of attempting to murder several people, other civilians, further individuals, another person, and an unknown person.

Exists a legal order maintaining the veteran's identity protection, which his attorneys have claimed is essential because he is at risk of attack.

He testified the investigation that he had only fired at people who were possessing firearms.

This assertion was dismissed in the official findings.

Evidence from the investigation was unable to be used directly as testimony in the criminal process.

During the trial, the accused was screened from view with a blue curtain.

He made statements for the first time in the proceedings at a hearing in that month, to answer "not responsible" when the accusations were put to him.

Kin of the deceased on Bloody Sunday made the trip from the city to Belfast Crown Court each day of the proceedings.

John Kelly, whose sibling was killed, said they were aware that attending the case would be difficult.

"I can see all details in my memory," the relative said, as we examined the main locations discussed in the trial – from Rossville Street, where Michael was fatally wounded, to the adjacent the area, where one victim and another victim were died.

"It returns me to my position that day.

"I participated in moving the victim and place him in the vehicle.

"I went through every moment during the evidence.

"But even with having to go through the process – it's still valuable for me."